Close Menu
Get early access
Get early access
Solutions for agencies

Manage every client release with the same technical standard.

Every client has a different application, roadmap and release calendar.

AppCompliance gives agencies one place to validate compiled client builds, review technical findings and track supported platform changes across the portfolio.

FIG.10Sample agency release week
Sample planning data

Mon

FitTrackBuild due 14:00 Ready for review

Tue

HealthCoRelease tomorrow Review required

Wed

Retail+Scan scheduled Ready for review
FitTrackClient update Status recorded

Thu

Finance AppBinary expected Pending

Fri

HealthCoSubmission window Next action due
Illustrative client names and release states - not production data. Status is conveyed with text and symbols as well as color.

Every client release carries two reputations

When a submission is delayed, the underlying cause may be technical.

The client usually experiences something simpler:

A commitment was missed.

Agencies are expected to build the application, understand the platform and guide the release successfully.

AppCompliance helps surface supported, technically detectable issues before submission—while the agency still has time to investigate, communicate and act.

It does not guarantee approval.

It makes avoidable technical findings easier to see before they become a client-facing release problem.

One agency. Many release calendars.

Your agency does not manage one application. It may manage:

  • different client roadmaps;
  • different development teams;
  • different SDK stacks;
  • different store accounts;
  • different submission owners;
  • different release deadlines;
  • different levels of platform experience.

As the portfolio grows, relying on project-specific checklists and individual knowledge becomes harder to sustain.

AppCompliance applies the same supported static-analysis standard to every compiled client release.

See the portfolio—not only the individual scan

A portfolio-level view helps the agency understand where attention is required.

At a glance, the agency can see:

  • which client builds have been analysed;
  • which releases contain unresolved findings;
  • where review is still required;
  • which applications may be affected by a monitored platform change;
  • which project needs the next action.
FIG.11Sample client portfolio status
Sample client portfolio

FitTrack

Ready for review
Next release
Release in four days
Scan state
Analysed
Attention
No unresolved supported findings
Next action
Record release decision

HealthCo

Three findings require review
Next release
Release tomorrow
Scan state
Analysed
Attention
Three findings require review
Next action
Assign finding owners

Retail+

Ready for review
Next release
Release next week
Scan state
Analysed
Attention
No unresolved supported findings
Next action
Confirm submission build

Finance App

Pending
Next release
Awaiting binary
Scan state
Not yet analysed
Attention
Binary not received
Next action
Request compiled binary
Illustrative portfolio data. The overview directs attention; each individual report remains the technical record.

The portfolio view does not replace the individual report.

It helps the agency decide where to look first.

Apply one validation standard across projects

Different client teams can use different development practices.

The technical validation standard does not have to change with them.

For every compiled release:

  1. Analyse the submitted artifact

    Run AppCompliance on the IPA, APK or AAB prepared for submission.

  2. Review the same result structure

    Each finding includes technical evidence, an official reference and a recommended next step.

  3. Resolve or accept findings

    Assign the issue to the relevant developer or release owner.

  4. Run the scan again

    Confirm whether the compiled application has changed as expected.

  5. Record the release status

    Keep the technical assessment connected to the relevant client build.

One standard makes the process easier to transfer between projects, developers and release owners.

Give clients a clearer release status

Clients do not need every technical detail.

They do need a reliable answer about the state of the release.

AppCompliance helps the agency separate:

That makes client communication more precise.

  • what has been checked;
  • what passed;
  • what requires review;
  • what is outside the scope of static analysis;
  • what action is underway;
  • what remains a store-review decision.
Instead of:

“The app should probably be fine.”

  • Unqualified prediction without a recorded technical state.
The agency can say:

“The compiled build has completed our supported technical checks. Two findings remain under review before submission.”

  • Checked scope, unresolved findings and next action are explicit.

The result is not a promise of approval.

It is a clearer account of the work that has been completed.

Scale the process without depending on one person

Experienced mobile developers carry valuable knowledge about Apple and Google requirements.

That knowledge is difficult to distribute perfectly across every project.

People take leave. Teams change. New developers join. Release responsibilities move.

AppCompliance keeps supported technical checks in the release process rather than only in individual memory.

Whether a project is led by a senior mobile specialist or a newly assembled team, the compiled release can be evaluated against the same supported check set.

Expert judgment remains important. The process no longer depends on it alone.

Connected interfaces

Use AppCompliance across agency workflows

  1. Dashboard

    Review client applications, scans, findings and monitoring alerts.

  2. CLI

    Let project teams run checks during development or release preparation.

  3. API

    Connect validation results to internal portals, reporting or project systems.

  4. CI/CD

    Apply the same supported release gate across multiple client repositories.

Shared supported standardConsistent result structure across every entry point

The agency can standardise the result without forcing every client project to use the same internal tooling.

Continue monitoring after launch

A successful release does not freeze Apple and Google requirements.

AppCompliance monitors supported platform changes and compares them with retained technical results from previously analysed client applications.

When a relationship is detected, the agency can see:

  • which client app may require attention;
  • which earlier scan result caused the match;
  • what Apple or Google changed;
  • when enforcement is expected;
  • what the project team should investigate.
FIG.12Supported change impact map
Illustrative supported platform change

SDK declaration requirement

Enforcement expected before the next release window

Matching retained evidence

HealthCo - scan HC-184

Supported SDK signature retained from an earlier analysed build

Affected sample client

HealthCo

Investigate the matched SDK before the next release

Illustrative sample only. A client enters the impact path only when a supported change matches retained technical evidence from that application.

This helps the agency raise a relevant issue before it appears unexpectedly in the next release cycle.

Explore monitoring

Protect client builds with a clear data boundary

Uploaded IPA, APK and AAB files are processed on EU infrastructure and deleted when the scan finishes.

Technical report data and scan results may be retained according to the applicable data policy so the agency can review findings and use monitoring.

AppCompliance is not affiliated with Apple or Google.

It does not guarantee approval and does not replace functional QA, runtime testing, legal review or store communication.

Frequently asked questions

Yes.

AppCompliance is designed to help agencies review technical validation status across multiple client applications and releases.

Yes.

A team can use the dashboard, API, CLI or CI/CD depending on its workflow while the underlying supported checks remain consistent.

AppCompliance reports are structured to explain the status, evidence and next steps associated with supported findings.

Use the appropriate reporting or sharing workflow available in your account.

No.

Apple and Google consider factors outside static analysis and retain full control over review and approval decisions.

No.

Monitoring covers supported changes that can be connected to retained technical results from previous AppCompliance scans.

Validate the next client release before submission pressure begins.

Apply one supported technical standard across client apps, teams and release calendars.