AppCompliance analyses the compiled application. That means the right moment to run it is after the IPA, APK or AAB has been built—and before your team commits to submission.
Your team decides what happens next. Continue the release, create follow-up work, notify an owner or stop the pipeline until the findings have been reviewed.
Sample data from the demonstration report.
Start with the tool that already owns the next step in your release process.
Run the validation gate inside your CI pipeline.
Run AppCompliance in the tools your mobile team already uses to build and publish releases.
Run the gate wherever your builds are containerised.
Turn a finding into concrete follow-up work.
Post the verdict where your team already coordinates releases.
Keep the validation result visible alongside the systems you already monitor.
Connect AppCompliance to internal tooling or workflows that are specific to your organisation.
Every integration starts from the same objective validation result. AppCompliance analyses the compiled IPA, APK or AAB against supported, technically detectable Apple App Store and Google Play requirements. The result can then be used by the system that owns the next action.
Use CI, mobile build tooling, Docker or the CLI to start validation.
Send findings to Jira, Linear or GitHub Issues when investigation is required.
Notify the team through Slack or Microsoft Teams.
Send validation events to Datadog or your own observability tooling.
Use webhooks or the REST API to connect internal systems.
The integration changes where the result appears. It does not change the evidence behind it.
AppCompliance provides the technical result. Your team defines what that result means for the release process.
A workflow can:
AppCompliance does not make the submission decision for your team. It gives the workflow objective evidence before that decision is made.
Without an integration, platform validation can become something the team remembers shortly before submission. With an integration, the same supported checks run at the same point for every build.
The release process does not need another checklist. It needs a gate that runs automatically.
An AppCompliance integration connects binary validation to a tool in your release workflow.
It can start a scan, return a verdict, create follow-up work, notify the team or pass the result to another system.
Run AppCompliance after the compiled IPA, APK or AAB has been produced and before the build is submitted or distributed as a release candidate.
This allows the scan to analyse the same compiled application your team intends to release.
The AppCompliance CLI returns a plain exit code that can be used by your pipeline.
Your team determines which result continues the workflow, requires review or blocks the next step.
Not necessarily.
You can connect AppCompliance to custom or unsupported tooling through the CLI, webhooks or REST API.
AppCompliance can create follow-up work in Jira, Linear and GitHub Issues.
This keeps findings inside the system where your team already assigns and resolves work.
No.
AppCompliance checks supported requirements that can be detected objectively from the compiled application.
Apple and Google may also evaluate runtime behaviour, app content, metadata and subjective requirements that cannot be determined through static analysis alone.
Approval decisions remain with Apple and Google.
Run AppCompliance in the release workflow your team already uses. Join the waitlist and validate your own IPA, APK and AAB builds before the public launch.
One email when your invitation is ready. No spam, nothing else.
